I'd ordered a copy of Minimus: Starting out in Latin
Then when I got home from work I got out the telescope and projected the sun's image onto a piece of paper so the kids could see the transit of Venus across the sun's face.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea16c/ea16c9712f16900385c84ee029493cbad1d43153" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50bfe/50bfe6d83be5dbd2c1788664e7951ba9da8550b3" alt=""
From this, you could almost get the impression that we're some kind of homeschooling superheroes. If we're this good when school isn't in session, how much better are we when it is?
Well...
Despite past ambitions, we seem to keep finding ourselves to be much less of classical homeschoolers than we had imagined we would be. The things that very reliably happen around here are: math, spelling, religion, and reading/read alouds. Much to our relief and happiness, the oldest two have really blossomed into recreational readers over the last year, and the read alouds they enjoy are, I'm convinced, fairly decent. (I recently finished reading them The Hobbit and am now reading Stuart Little, while MrsDarwin is working through David Copperfield with them.)
However, while I know we'd both pictured guiding the kids through a detailed round of world history, mythology and the beginnings of world literature, this has been a lot more rocky. We were really good about reading mythology with them (and our oldest now enjoys reading it herself). They've heard plenty of the bible and about the saints. And we had a moderately successful run at reading Gombrich's A Little History of the World
A big part of the problem, frankly, is me. Over the last 10 years, since leaving college, I've fallen back in love with reading history and read a lot of it. The problem is, that in the process I've managed to pick fights with nearly any book we try to use with them, except historical novels aimed at kids (The Winged Watchman
In some ways, I think time may simply be our friend here. As they get a little older, they'll be able to read and appreciate better stuff. And, frankly, I don't look back and think "wow, I learned so much in third grade history, it's a good thing that I got all that covered". Third grade history in parochial school involved something about California and the main things I can recall is the model of a Mission I built and the argument I got into with my teacher as to whether the Vikings discovered America before the Spanish. (I was told if I wrote "The Vikings" rather than "Columbus" on the test I would be marked down because that textbook discussed Columbus and not the Norse, and any reading I had done on my own was beside the point. I went ahead and did it anyway because I can never walk away from a fight.)
4 comments:
I had the same problem when I insisted that we didn't land on Plymouth Rock but rather that it was Plymouth Rock which landed on us.
Consider me jealous! I didn't pay that much attention to the transit until about an hour before it was supposed to start. I misread the info about it and thought it only lasted 20 minutes (instead of it taking 20 minutes to become fully visible). I rushed home from work while my husband tried to reflect the sun with a mirror onto a wall in the house. He had a hard time getting a good sized reflection and I didn't actually get home until after I thought it was finished. He asked if I wanted to keep trying and I said there was no point since it was only supposed to be 20 minutes and it was over. So we quit right about the time you could actually see it. :( I suppose I'll be better prepared next time or at least leave instructions for my grandchildren.
Have you seen this?
http://orbis.stanford.edu/
Oh my goodness, you might could spend weeks playing with this thing.
Its really about doing the right thing at the right developmental time... I just read a great article by Laura Berquist about not rushing to "the good stuff"
http://www.motherofdivinegrace.org/curriculum/classical-education-and-how-to-implement-it-in-a-large-family
Post a Comment