Because most philosophies that frown on reproduction don't survive.

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

Taking back the sexy

The marketing geniuses at Victoria's Secret have recently had a revelation: maybe you can overdo sexy.

Victoria's Secret likes to ask in its marketing, "What is sexy?" Now the lingerie chain is trying to figure out, "What's too sexy?"

The chief executive of the brand known for its provocative televised fashion shows and alluring stores made an admission yesterday. In her mind, the brand has become "too sexy" -- or at least the wrong kind of sexy.

"We have so much gotten off our heritage," CEO Sharen Jester Turney said in a conference call with analysts. Responding to the past year's weak sales and focus-group feedback, she said, "We will return to an ultra-feminine lingerie brand to meet [customer] needs and expectations."

Now, I'm going to come out and say it: frankly my dear, I don't want to go around all the time feeling sexy. Thank God that those hormonal days of youth, in which one spent most of the time either thinking or trying not to think about sex, are past!

Perhaps it has become financially obvious (and what other kind of obvious is there, marketing-wise?) that a relentless emphasis on defining your brand as "sexy, sexy, SEXY" may start to grind on the core customer base, most of whom a) do not have the body they did at nineteen, and b) do not desire to be classified as skanks, and therefore want to look good with their clothes on.

I like the idea of "ultra-feminine". It implies a foundational garment with superior support that is pretty. "Sexy" implies scanty and flimsy, and does no practical good if the concept can't translate into actually looking fine on a real female body. Is underwear that makes you look fat really sexy? I don't think so, Victoria's Secret, and so I applaud your move into "ultra-feminine" territory. Everyone wins when real aesthetics trump fake aesthetics.

Now, if you'd do something about your sleazy posters in the mall window, I'd really be grateful.

4 comments:

Jay Anderson said...

I think we've learned that the lovely and talented Miss Lima (pictured in the linked article) is obviously much "too sexy" for the Catholic blogosphere.

;-)

annafromcincy said...

"They're taking' sexy baack..."

annafromcincy said...

"...them other stores don't know hot to aaaact..."

Karie, the Regular Guy's Extraordinary Wife said...

I have only wandered into a VS when my sister needed some new undergarments. She asked "why don't you look around?" I think I mentioned that I would have to drop 50 lbs first. :) I would _greatly_ appreciate VS revamping their store to sell to _all_ women, not just the teeny rompers who think that going out in a camisole and short shorts constitutes "dressing".